Jeter v. Mayo Clinic Arizona [Brief] (2005)
ثبت نشده
چکیده
Facts?Belinda and William Jeter sued Mayo Clinic Arizona for the negligent destruction of five frozen pre-embryos. The pre-embryos were derived from Mrs. Jeter?s eggs and Mr. Jeter?s sperm [7], were allowed to develop a couple of days then preserved for future attempts at in vitro [8] fertilization [9]. Five of the pre-embryos were somehow lost during transportation to another clinic, the Arizona Center for Fertility Studies. The Jeters claimed compensation for wrongful death [5], negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of a bailment contract. Law?Arizona Revised Statutes §12-611 stated in part, ?When death of a person is caused by wrongful act, neglect or default, and the act, neglect or default is such as would, if death had not ensued, have entitled the party injured to maintain an action to recover damages in respect thereof, then, and in every such case, the person who would have been liable if death had not ensued shall be liable to an action for damages. Ruling?The word ?person? in Arizona?s wrongful death [5] statute does not include in its scope a cryopreserved, three-day-old 8-cell pre-embryo. Dismissal of the wrongful death [5] claim was proper. However, the Jeters could sue under the negligence and breach of fiduciary duty or bailment contract claims so the trial court?s dismissal of those claims was reversed.
منابع مشابه
Jeter v. Mayo (2005)
In Jeter v. Mayo, the Court of Appeals of Arizona in 2005 held that a cryopreserved, three-dayold pre-embryo is not a person for purposes of Arizona's wrongful death [3] statutes, and that the Arizona Legislature was best suited to decide whether to expand the law to include cryopreserved pre-embryos. The Court of Appeals affirmed a decision by the Maricopa County Superior Court to dismiss a co...
متن کاملJeter v. Mayo Clinic Arizona [Brief] (2005)
Facts?Belinda and William Jeter sued Mayo Clinic Arizona for the negligent destruction of five frozen pre-embryos. The pre-embryos were derived from Mrs. Jeter?s eggs and Mr. Jeter?s sperm [7], were allowed to develop a couple of days then preserved for future attempts at in vitro [8] fertilization [9]. Five of the pre-embryos were somehow lost during transportation to another clinic, the Arizo...
متن کاملJeter v. Mayo Clinic Arizona [Brief] (2005)
Facts?Belinda and William Jeter sued Mayo Clinic Arizona for the negligent destruction of five frozen pre-embryos. The pre-embryos were derived from Mrs. Jeter?s eggs and Mr. Jeter?s sperm [7], were allowed to develop a couple of days then preserved for future attempts at in vitro [8] fertilization [9]. Five of the pre-embryos were somehow lost during transportation to another clinic, the Arizo...
متن کاملJeter v. Mayo Clinic Arizona [Brief] (2005)
Facts?Belinda and William Jeter sued Mayo Clinic Arizona for the negligent destruction of five frozen pre-embryos. The pre-embryos were derived from Mrs. Jeter?s eggs and Mr. Jeter?s sperm [7], were allowed to develop a couple of days then preserved for future attempts at in vitro [8] fertilization [9]. Five of the pre-embryos were somehow lost during transportation to another clinic, the Arizo...
متن کاملLegislation of Presumed Consent for End-Of-Life Organ Donation in the United Kingdom (UK): Undermining Values in a Multicultural Society
I Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix, Arizona, USA. II Department of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Mayo Clinic Arizona Phoenix, Arizona, USA. III Department of Philosophy, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA. IV Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Florida, USA. [email protected] ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2018